Opacity
The "resistance" light experiences in penetrating matter
Eddington Luminosity
The Luminosity at which radiation outweighs gravity
Heat transport
Mechanism to transport heat (radiative diffusion, convection, conduction)
Stellar structure equations
The equations that govern the structure and evolution of stars. Usually solved numerically with codes like MESA
Homology
A simplification to the stellar structure equations that allows for analytical scaling solutions
Stellar evolution
A description of how stars interior and appearance changes with time and how these changes depend on parameters, such as the initial mass
High-mass stellar evolution
High-mass stars deviate from evolution from low-mass stars and play a critical role in nucleosynthesis
— read CO Ch. 9.2 and 9.3 —
ni: number density of absorbers per unit volume;
σ: absorption cross section
Other definitions for opacity exist. In our definition it is the total cross section per unit mass of the medium (units: cm2 g-1).
— read CO Ch. 9.2 and 9.3 —
ni: number density of absorbers per unit volume;
σ: absorption cross section
Other definitions for opacity exist. In our definition it is the total cross section per unit mass of the medium (units: cm2 g-1).
— read CO Ch. 9.2 and 9.3 —
ni: number density of absorbers per unit volume;
σ: absorption cross section
Other definitions for opacity exist. In our definition it is the total cross section per unit mass of the medium (units: cm2 g-1).
— read CO 10.6 —
Accelerating charges radiate energy at a rate (Larmor formula):
(cgs units) with P is the power, q the charge
the acceleration, c the speed of light.
Valid in the low-energy (no recoil) limit,
the photon energy does not change.
It follows from equating the radiated power to the incoming energy flux:
The Thomson cross section can also be obtained by equating the electrostatic energy corresponding to a sphere of radius rT with the rest energy of the electron
The corresponding cross section
is the Thompson cross section barring numerical constant.
schematic of the interaction of an electromagnetic wave with a charged particle. Due to oscillating E-field, the particle (electron) experiences a force of
in the direction of the E-field, causing it to radiate. In the low-energy limit, the frequency of the radiation is just the same as that of the incoming wave, resulting in a scattering of the EM-wave (Thomson scattering).
— read CO 10.6 —
This results in an (outward) radiation force
Another, more general, way to write this is, is in terms of the opacity κ — the cross section per unit mass κ=σ/(me+mp) in this case. We then obtain
.
The Eddington Luminosity sets an upper mass for stars!
— see CO 9.2 —
Sources of opacity:
where
is the Thomson cross section
Question: Why can't free electrons absorb photons?
Question: Why the (1+X) factor?
— see CO 9.2 —
Sources of opacity:
(cgs units). These forms are Kramer's laws where frequency-dependent opacities have been averaged over the radiation field (Rosseland mean). Expressions are very approximate and are valid only in a certain T-range.
Question: How do we get the combined opacity at a single frequency, κν?
Question: Why is the Rosseland mean opacity harmonically averaged over the radiation field?
These opacities are so called Rosseland mean opacities:
that is, the inverse of the opacity (the "transparancy") is weighted by the radiation field.
Why the sudden drop in opacity to 0 at these "cliffs"?
— see CO 9.2 —
Sources of opacity:
valid for 3,000 < T < 6,000 and -10 < log10 ρ < -5. Important in "cool" atmospheres, where neutral H can bind a second electron. This electron has a low binding energy (compared to neutral H); it dissociates with photons energies above 0.75 eV (~104 K).
degenerate regions
These opacities are so called Rosseland mean opacities:
that is, the inverse of the opacity (the "transparancy") is weighted by the radiation field.
use opacity tables to find
as function of temperature and pressure.
We identify with increasing T and ρ:
use opacity tables to find
as function of temperature and pressure.
We identify with increasing T and ρ:
— read CO 10.4 —
Energy transport by diffusion of radiation results in an energy flux (units: [E L-2 T-1]) of
with
the radiation energy density,
the
photon diffusivity,
the mean free path,
c the speed of light,
the opacity.
Equating this to the luminosity flux,
one obtains
where
is the opacity weighted by the radiation field
(Rosseland mean).
Following convention, the temperature gradient is recast in terms of a gradient with respect to pressure
With the hydrostatic balance equation, the
Radiative temperature gradient becomes
needs to adjust
in order for the energy to be transported by radiation!
The stability condition against convection is
the adiabatic exponent. A strong density gradient (stratification) — dense material below light material — stabilizes fluids.
If we define the EoS as:
where
for an ideal EoS. In the adiabatic case, we obtain
the stability criterion transforms to:
some thermodynamical relations may be helpful
where
are the heat capacities at constant pressure and temperature. from this the heat capacity ratio
follows. Another is the first law of thermodynamics:
if we put
we obtain a relationship between the heat capacity ratios
When the radiative gradient becomes too steep, convective "blobs" will rise because they stay lighter than the surroundings. The condition for convection is:
which is Schwarzschield criterion (ignoring any composition gradient). More preciese, in a convective medium, the relation
holds.
Theories as Mixing length theory offer a phenomenological model to calculate the energy flux that can be carried by convection.
It turns out that that under most (stellar) conditions
is an acceptable approximation. In other words, convection in stars is very effective. The temperature gradient only needs to be slightly above adiabatic to carry the entire energy flux!
In mixing length theory the convective blobs are assumed to travel for a mixing length
before equilibriating with the surroundings
where δq and δT are differences betweeen the heat contents and temperature of the blobs with its surroundings, e.g.,
cP is the heat capacity at constant pressure, vbl is the velocity of the blobs. After further manipulation and phenomenological reasoning, one obtains
where α ~ β ~ 1 and
If we take
(the convective bubbles are anyway modelled as adiabatic), it follows that for stellar conditions only a slight overadiabicity,
suffices to transport the energy flux
by convection.
read CO p.330—334
Stellar structure equations
which is the Schwarzschield criterion. But other choices (e.g. Ledoux criterion) are available.
where
is mass,
is radius, P pressure, T temperature, l luminosity,
density, G Newton's gravitational constant
and
the temperature gradient, s entropy,
the energy production rate, and Xi the composition.