Opacity
The "resistance" light experiences in penetrating matter
Heat transport
Mechanism to transport heat (radiative diffusion, convection, conduction)
Stellar structure equations
The equations that govern the structure and evolution of stars. Usually solved numerically with codes like MESA
Homology
A simplification to the stellar structure equations that allows for analytical scaling solutions
Stellar evolution
A description of how stars interior and appearance changes with time and how these changes depend on parameters, such as the initial mass
High-mass stellar evolution
High-mass stars deviate from evolution from low-mass stars and play a critical role in nucleosynthesis
— read CO Ch. 9.2 and 9.3 —
ni: number density of absorbers per unit volume;
σ: absorption cross section
Other definitions for opacity exist. In our definition it is the total cross section per unit mass of the medium (units: cm2 g-1).
— read CO Ch. 9.2 and 9.3 —
ni: number density of absorbers per unit volume;
σ: absorption cross section
Other definitions for opacity exist. In our definition it is the total cross section per unit mass of the medium (units: cm2 g-1).
— read CO Ch. 9.2 and 9.3 —
ni: number density of absorbers per unit volume;
σ: absorption cross section
Other definitions for opacity exist. In our definition it is the total cross section per unit mass of the medium (units: cm2 g-1).
— see CO 9.2 —
Sources of opacity:
where is the Thomson cross section (see module 4).
Question: Why can't free electrons absorb photons?
Question: Why the (1+X) factor?
— see CO 9.2 —
Sources of opacity:
(cgs units). These forms are Kramer's laws where frequency-dependent opacities have been averaged over the radiation field (Rosseland mean). Expressions are very approximate and are valid only in a certain T-range.
Question: How do we get the combined opacity at a single frequency, κν?
Question: Why is the Rosseland mean opacity harmonically averaged over the radiation field?
These opacities are so called Rosseland mean opacities:
that is, the inverse of the opacity (the "transparancy") is weighted by the radiation field.
Why the suddon drop in opacity to 0 at these "cliffs"?
— see CO 9.2 —
Sources of opacity:
valid for 3,000 < T < 6,000 and -10 < log10 ρ < -5. Important in "cool" atmospheres, where neutral H can bind a second electron. This electron has a low binding energy (compared to neutral H); it dissociates with photons energies above 0.75 eV (~104 K).
degenerate regions
These opacities are so called Rosseland mean opacities:
that is, the inverse of the opacity (the "transparancy") is weighted by the radiation field.
use opacity tables to find
as function of temperature and pressure.
We identify with increasing T and ρ:
— read CO 10.4 —
Energy transport by diffusion of radiation results in an energy flux (units: [E L-2 T-1]) of
with the radiation energy density, the photon diffusivity, the mean free path, c the speed of light, the opacity. Equating this to the luminosity flux, one obtains
where is the opacity weighted by the radiation field (Rosseland mean). Following convention, the temperature gradient is recast in terms of a gradient with respect to pressure
With the hydrostatic balance equation, this radiative temperature gradient becomes
needs to adjust to in order for the energy to be transported by radiation!
The stability condition against convection is
the adiabatic exponent. A strong density gradient (stratification) — dense material below light material — stabilizes fluids.
If we define the EoS as:
where for an ideal EoS. In the adiabatic case, we obtain
the stability criterion transforms to:
some thermodynamical relations may be helpful
where are the heat capacities at constant pressure and temperature. from this the heat capacity ratio follows. Another is the first law of thermodynamics:
if we put we obtain a relationship between the heat capacity ratios
When the radiative gradient becomes too steep, convective "blobs" will rise because they stay lighter than the surroundings. The condition for convection is:
which is Schwarzschield criterion (ignoring any composition gradient). More preciese, in a convective medium, the relation
holds.
Theories as Mixing length theory offer a phenomenological model to calculate the energy flux that can be carried by convection. It turns out that that under most (stellar) conditions is an acceptable approximation. In other words, convection in stars is very effective. The temperature gradient only needs to be slightly above adiabatic to carry the entire energy flux!
In mixing length theory the convective blobs are assumed to travel for a mixing length before equilibriating with the surroundings
where δq and δT are differences betweeen the heat contents and temperature of the blobs with its surroundings, e.g., cP is the heat capacity at constant pressure, vbl is the velocity of the blobs. After further manipulation and phenomenological reasoning, one obtains
where α ~ β ~ 1 and If we take (the convective bubbles are anyway modelled as adiabatic), it follows that for stellar conditions only a slight overadiabicity, suffices to transport the energy flux by convection.
read CO p.330—334
Stellar structure equations
which is the Schwarzschield criterion. But other choices (e.g. Ledoux criterion) are available.
where m is mass, r is radius, P pressure, T temperature, l luminosity, ρ density, G Newton's gravitational constant the temperature gradient, s entropy, ε the energy production rate, and Xi the composition.
The stellar structure equations represent a system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). To solve them, we need boundary conditions:
These relations follow from the Eddington approximation for the atmosphere:
at τ=2/3 — the photosphere — the temperature equals the effective temperature and the pressure can be found by integrating dP/dr to infinity
Stellar evolution is a thoroughly numerical problem. Everything we "know" about star's interiors comes from numerical modelling. Yet, it has proven very successful. Overall, there is a very precise understanding about stellar evolution — especially compared to other astrophysical research fields.
MESA is a publicly available collection of codes ("modules"), aimed towards 1D stellar evolution, which are contributed by many users from the entire planet!
Above all, it's fun! Strongly recommend the ambitious student to download and check it out!
read CO Ch.13.1—13.2
For a solar mass star: 1 molecular cloud collapse; 2 fragmentation; 3 contraction and heat up; 4 protostars and disks; 5 contraction slowing; 6 onset of fusion; 7 main sequence; 8 H shell burning; 9 He flash; 10 He burning; 11 double shell burning; 12 planetary nebular; 13 White dwarf; 14 WD cooling
Some insight into the stellar structure equations can be obtained by comparing two stars of different mass, assuming homology
where is the homologous mass coordinate
Note: The conditions for homology are only rarely satisfied.
For example, when a stars' core become degenerate while the outer regions expands — the RGB stage — it breaks
Applying homology to the stellar structure equations, we obtain:
Applying the homologous relationship for the center ( ) to the general version of the EoS:
Therefore, for a collapsing star:
Contracting (cooling!) stars heat up for an ideal gas, but contract for a degenerate stars!
Stellar evolution can be understood as a continuous (quasi-static) collapse, interceded by prolonged periods of "steady" nuclear burning
They end up as Brown Dwarfs.
Stellar evolution can be understood as a continuous (quasi-static) collapse, interceded by prolonged periods of "steady" nuclear burning
Note: after H-burning the temperature in the now He-core would increase due to the higher μ. This is not reflected in the figure.
Stars end up as degenerate objects (White Dwarfs)
Stellar evolution can be understood as a continuous (quasi-static) collapse, interceded by prolonged periods of "steady" nuclear burning
More massive than the Chandrasekhar mass; They eventually explode as supernovae
Stellar evolution can be understood as a continuous (quasi-static) collapse, interceded by prolonged periods of "steady" nuclear burning
— read CO 12.3 —
(although more realistic models will feature some structure)
This is known as the "forbidden zone"
→ Pre main-sequence evolution tracks and observations in Taurus-Auriga star formation complex (Stahler 1988).
— read CO 13.2 —
This means high-mass stars quickly leave the MS, while low-mass stars are still on the MS
The main-sequence turnoff is a way to determine the age of globular cluster stars.
Perryman et al. (1997) — Hertzsprung-Russell diagram for stars in the solar neighborhood, which distances have been determined by the Hipparcos spacecraft.
This means high-mass stars quickly leave the MS, while low-mass stars are still on the MS
The main-sequence turnoff is a way to determine the age of globular cluster stars.
Question: What does the branch (A) below the MS represent?
Gaia Collaboration et al. (2018) — 20 years later, there is Gaia.
The evolution depends on stellar mass and also metallicity
mass | core-burning | shell burning | outcome |
---|---|---|---|
~0.1 | H (convective) | none | He WD |
~0.1—0.5 | H | H | H/He WD |
~0.5—2.3 | H, He | H | CO WD |
~2.3—8 | H, He | H,He | C-rich WD |
~6.0—8 | H, He,C | H,He | O-rich WD |
>8 | H, He,..., Si | various | core collapse Supernovae |
Question: These helium white dwarfs haven't been observed yet. Why not?
Left: Example of a so-called Kippenhahn diagram — evolution of the internal physical structure with time. Red-shaded regions denote nuclear burning, grey convection. Right: corresponding curves in the HR-diagram. (c) Onno Pols
(B) hydrogen is exhausted in the center; onset of H-shell burning; growth of envelope.
The H-shell burning and the contraction of the (near-)degenerate He core, cause the envelope to expand!
The underlying reason is that nuclear reaction are very sensitive to temperature; a tiny increase in T (due to contraction of the shell), greatly increases the luminosity output
Left: Example of a so-called Kippenhahn diagram — evolution of the internal physical structure with time. Red-shaded regions denote nuclear burning, grey convection. Right: corresponding curves in the HR-diagram. (c) Onno Pols
Q: Why does the convective zone grow during the RGB phase
(C) the expanding envelope becomes convective; the star moves up ("ascend") the Red Giant Branch (RGB).
The He-degenerate core contracts and grows; Luminosity and nuclear burning increase, resulting in higher mass (and smaller!) core; the high temperature gradient ensures that the nuclear burning shell is thin
Left: Example of a so-called Kippenhahn diagram — evolution of the internal physical structure with time. Red-shaded regions denote nuclear burning, grey convection. Right: corresponding curves in the HR-diagram. (c) Onno Pols
(D-F) an accelerating evolution along the red giant branch.
The envelope has by now become largely convective (high luminosity and high opacity!); evolution along the Hayashi line
Left: Example of a so-called Kippenhahn diagram — evolution of the internal physical structure with time. Red-shaded regions denote nuclear burning, grey convection. Right: corresponding curves in the HR-diagram. (c) Onno Pols
Q: Why doesn't the energy liberated in the He flash come out?
(F) He is (explosively) ignited in the degenerate core
A Helium flash occurs; the He-burning is (for a short period) out of control, reaching power levels comparable to the galaxy. However, most of the generated energy does not reach the surface. Because the degenerate core's pressure is insensitive to temperature. We do not observe this as the energy goes into internal energy, lifting the degeneracy!
Left: Example of a so-called Kippenhahn diagram — evolution of the internal physical structure with time. Red-shaded regions denote nuclear burning, grey convection. Right: corresponding curves in the HR-diagram. (c) Onno Pols
(G-H) He core burning
He-core burning expands the core and causes the envelope to shrink. These He-burning stars occupy the so-called Horizontal branch
Left: Example of a so-called Kippenhahn diagram — evolution of the internal physical structure with time. Red-shaded regions denote nuclear burning, grey convection. Right: corresponding curves in the HR-diagram. (c) Onno Pols
(H-J) He shell burning; the star ascends the Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB)
On the AGB the star may experience strong pulsations, sheds its outer envelope to the ISM, before its He-fuel is exhausted. A degenerate C/O-core remains as a White Dwarf
— read CO Ch. 15.3 —
This reverses the nuclear fusion in a few seconds! For example:
this releases a huge amount of neutrinos (cooling)
background image source: APOD
(c) Hubble Space Telescope/NASA, ESA; R. Kirshner, and M. Mutchler; R. Avila
(c) Hubble Space Telescope/NASA, ESA; R. Kirshner, and M. Mutchler; R. Avila
SN 1987A Is the most-studied supernovae. It exploded in 1987 in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). See astronomy.com article
— read CO p.542 —
Nucleosynthesis describes the process of producing the atomic nuclei. We distinghuish:
Elements heavier than Fe are produced by neutron (n) capture
β-decay: (for a free neutron)
—congrats—